This meeting is the last one to meet the teacher again. In fact, before the meeting, I had an argument with Elsa, fighting against the opposite sides. And I had a lots of confusion abort anti-abortion. What’s worse, I want to change the topic of my issue paper. I got totally lost how to explain the babies who have not abortion would live happier lives. Women’s poverty also causes the abortion, I know my position do not change, however, it seemed more difficult for me to convince others not to abortion. I can’t ensure these babies’ afterwards lives.
In contract to my irresolution, my teacher advised me to debate for my position. To be much more eloquent, I need find some strong evidence. After the teacher provided me other thoughts about the babies, I think at least I found my roads to take. Another problem I have is not having good source for my paper. The problem is easy to solve but needs time to struggle for it.
After meeting with the teacher, I think it helps me a lot. I’m easy to think a lot and would start to worry about the position and development of my issue paper. After Teacher told me I need to adherer to continue the topic I choose, I agree that I should never give it up so easily.
Sunday, December 21, 2008
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Annotation 5
Annotation:
Lisa Tolin. The effects of abortion. Psychology Today, Jul/Aug 97
In the article, we can clearly see the effect of abortion. In previous article, we may know the psychology trauma of the women go to abortion is much more than the miscarried ones. It’s a study to examine how such factors and ethnicity influence the psychological after-effects of abortions. They find that the best clue to women’s mental health is their state of mind before the pregnancy--in particular the levels of self-esteem. In eclipse of reason, surely we’re impressive the clinic room. The psychology trauma is overlapped with the experience of the clinic room and unhappy memory to get unwanted pregnancy.
Surprisingly, the religion like Catholics seldom gets involved to the factors which women go to abortion. Nor did religion affect women's long-term happiness after abortion, once education level, income, and initial self-esteem were taken into account. In the end of the article, it says: No one is sure how the added stress of Operation Rescue activism and recent attacks on clinics and doctors will affect women who choose to abort.
In my view, based on the article, the abortion’s necessity is uncertain. Go a step further; do the abortion rights and choices controlled in women’s free wills? I think the reasons why cause women go to abortion are the government’s turn. Women tend to associate the two unhappy experience, so in my personal viewpoint, the mental treatment is much important or in the rest of life, the problem is still unsolved.
Revise:
Lisa Tolin. The effects of abortion (Jul/Aug 97) Psychology Today, the essay from:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-19970701-000009.html
In “The effects of abortion”, these author compares two groups: one is the miscarriage andthe other is the abortion group. To our surprise, the percentage between miscarriage and abortion groups change surprisingly in six months to five year. The abortion group still suffers mental distress even after quite long time. Besides, the researchers also mention that women who had an abortion have to make the best to avoid thinking about the event. Because women are easy to associate the two unhappy events together, and that’s the main reason to let women suffer mental illness. The two unhappy experiences, one is the unwanted pregnancy maybe to be rapped and the other is the period when women are undertook abortion surgeon.
One of the researchers says: "It has always been considered, and this study also shows, that the decision to terminate may bring with it long-standing feelings of anxiety and guilt.”
In my viewpoint, I think the abortion does do more or less to women. Though they might be reluctant to abortion, but the mental guilt still exists. Connect to my previous annotation, abortion is very awful period. Abortion can solve the problem now, but it can’t promise to solve problems in the future. Furthermore, I think the government should have the emergency agent to deal with such episodes. Namely, women don’t undergo the experience. Government could strengthen the mental therapy to keep their accept for the child.
Lisa Tolin. The effects of abortion. Psychology Today, Jul/Aug 97
In the article, we can clearly see the effect of abortion. In previous article, we may know the psychology trauma of the women go to abortion is much more than the miscarried ones. It’s a study to examine how such factors and ethnicity influence the psychological after-effects of abortions. They find that the best clue to women’s mental health is their state of mind before the pregnancy--in particular the levels of self-esteem. In eclipse of reason, surely we’re impressive the clinic room. The psychology trauma is overlapped with the experience of the clinic room and unhappy memory to get unwanted pregnancy.
Surprisingly, the religion like Catholics seldom gets involved to the factors which women go to abortion. Nor did religion affect women's long-term happiness after abortion, once education level, income, and initial self-esteem were taken into account. In the end of the article, it says: No one is sure how the added stress of Operation Rescue activism and recent attacks on clinics and doctors will affect women who choose to abort.
In my view, based on the article, the abortion’s necessity is uncertain. Go a step further; do the abortion rights and choices controlled in women’s free wills? I think the reasons why cause women go to abortion are the government’s turn. Women tend to associate the two unhappy experience, so in my personal viewpoint, the mental treatment is much important or in the rest of life, the problem is still unsolved.
Revise:
Lisa Tolin. The effects of abortion (Jul/Aug 97) Psychology Today, the essay from:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-19970701-000009.html
In “The effects of abortion”, these author compares two groups: one is the miscarriage andthe other is the abortion group. To our surprise, the percentage between miscarriage and abortion groups change surprisingly in six months to five year. The abortion group still suffers mental distress even after quite long time. Besides, the researchers also mention that women who had an abortion have to make the best to avoid thinking about the event. Because women are easy to associate the two unhappy events together, and that’s the main reason to let women suffer mental illness. The two unhappy experiences, one is the unwanted pregnancy maybe to be rapped and the other is the period when women are undertook abortion surgeon.
One of the researchers says: "It has always been considered, and this study also shows, that the decision to terminate may bring with it long-standing feelings of anxiety and guilt.”
In my viewpoint, I think the abortion does do more or less to women. Though they might be reluctant to abortion, but the mental guilt still exists. Connect to my previous annotation, abortion is very awful period. Abortion can solve the problem now, but it can’t promise to solve problems in the future. Furthermore, I think the government should have the emergency agent to deal with such episodes. Namely, women don’t undergo the experience. Government could strengthen the mental therapy to keep their accept for the child.
Friday, December 5, 2008
Comments
For Ocean
I think in your article, a point intertwines in different view and it’s good. To give my advice, in my personal opinion, first, you should separate your article into paragraphs. Second, there are many long sentences in it; you could revise by condensing it in belief form.
To Roxy
There are some grammar errors in your paper and you can correct them. Uh….in fact, I can’t tell what’s your response of the article. I think you can reinforce your personal ideas more and say much deeper about what you’d discuss. Besides, in whole, the connection between paragraphs could be much stronger.
To陳怡如
The beginning of your article is great, because you tell the readers the work cited. In my viewpoint, I think you don’t have to mention that separating the article into two. You can summarize it directly and just present the main ideas of origin one. Besides, I think you can focus only one or two points to say them much deeper, not repeating them again. And you can revise your paper to condense your summary and reinforce your response.
I think in your article, a point intertwines in different view and it’s good. To give my advice, in my personal opinion, first, you should separate your article into paragraphs. Second, there are many long sentences in it; you could revise by condensing it in belief form.
To Roxy
There are some grammar errors in your paper and you can correct them. Uh….in fact, I can’t tell what’s your response of the article. I think you can reinforce your personal ideas more and say much deeper about what you’d discuss. Besides, in whole, the connection between paragraphs could be much stronger.
To陳怡如
The beginning of your article is great, because you tell the readers the work cited. In my viewpoint, I think you don’t have to mention that separating the article into two. You can summarize it directly and just present the main ideas of origin one. Besides, I think you can focus only one or two points to say them much deeper, not repeating them again. And you can revise your paper to condense your summary and reinforce your response.
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Revise Midterm
Over 25 years ago, the Bay Area Writing Project has changed their processes of building a composition. Nowadays, students are asked to think the article aims, specific various readers, and different composition modes unlike before.
Further, the students don't get involved into other’s literature masterpiece , so they need the teachers to lead them to read novels, plays, poems, etc. What is more, the purpose implies to those essential tips (relates to mode, aim, audience, and media)
With the advanced technology and universal use of computers, the writing is surely impacted. Schools begin to set up computer classrooms which pupils can write, edit, and publish their ideas in nonprint media. Most computers are easily accessed by the department of language and art, for there’re plenty software to utilize. Moreover, instructors can request their students to read some net materials if they have no idea about their paper; go the step further, showing how others present the same notions. What’s more, the important part is that since the writing has been potential career in 21st era (for filming, TV, and Internet), the school teachers may want their pupils involved the profitable jobs if they’re trained into professional level.
It’s obviously that writing has altered because the computer development and brand new lifestyle due to Internet. However, because the tremendous needs of markets and the profits, such kind of writing shows to solve and improve our short time in composition.
I have the same notion with the article. Since the writing can be applied into differnent fields.
Recently, the popular entertainments are novel, drama plays, and so on. Literature has been changed in order to cater the mass. Writers can be benefited from the results of commerce. For example, the writers can publish their books. If their books are popular, the story also can be adapted into dramas, movies, and even comic books. It’s the trend of the 21st centaury while the early modern age there was Shakespeare style to be in vogue. However, since this is the dog-eat-dog era, different fields companies should combine together to compete others. The competitiveness can cause the healthy competition, but they would gradually become vulgar in order to cater to the favor of most people. Take the popular series of Japanese novels; there are lots of improper contents for youngsters- the amorous or violent descriptions. So it’s the government turn to take care of these youngsters, whatever programs or books are, they should set up a classification which let young ages people keep away these contents.
Further, the students don't get involved into other’s literature masterpiece , so they need the teachers to lead them to read novels, plays, poems, etc. What is more, the purpose implies to those essential tips (relates to mode, aim, audience, and media)
With the advanced technology and universal use of computers, the writing is surely impacted. Schools begin to set up computer classrooms which pupils can write, edit, and publish their ideas in nonprint media. Most computers are easily accessed by the department of language and art, for there’re plenty software to utilize. Moreover, instructors can request their students to read some net materials if they have no idea about their paper; go the step further, showing how others present the same notions. What’s more, the important part is that since the writing has been potential career in 21st era (for filming, TV, and Internet), the school teachers may want their pupils involved the profitable jobs if they’re trained into professional level.
It’s obviously that writing has altered because the computer development and brand new lifestyle due to Internet. However, because the tremendous needs of markets and the profits, such kind of writing shows to solve and improve our short time in composition.
I have the same notion with the article. Since the writing can be applied into differnent fields.
Recently, the popular entertainments are novel, drama plays, and so on. Literature has been changed in order to cater the mass. Writers can be benefited from the results of commerce. For example, the writers can publish their books. If their books are popular, the story also can be adapted into dramas, movies, and even comic books. It’s the trend of the 21st centaury while the early modern age there was Shakespeare style to be in vogue. However, since this is the dog-eat-dog era, different fields companies should combine together to compete others. The competitiveness can cause the healthy competition, but they would gradually become vulgar in order to cater to the favor of most people. Take the popular series of Japanese novels; there are lots of improper contents for youngsters- the amorous or violent descriptions. So it’s the government turn to take care of these youngsters, whatever programs or books are, they should set up a classification which let young ages people keep away these contents.
Midterm: From tripod to Comes: A new metaphor for the language arts
Over 25 years ago, the Bay Area Writing Project has changed their initiatives which emphasize the processes of building a composition- from planning, composing, revising, and publishing. Nowadays, students are asked to think the article aims, specific various readers, and different composition modes unlike before. For they could realize the concrete necessaries how to combine their thought unfolded into many audience rather than sole instructors.
However, the students still not get involved into other’s literature masterpiece in the history, so they need the teachers accompanied to lead them approach like novels, plays, poems, etc. What’s more, the purpose reading those implies to those essential tips (relates to mode, aim, audience, and media)
With the advanced technology and universal use of computers, the writing is surely impacted. Schools begin to set up computer classrooms which pupils can write, edit, and publish their ideas in nonprint media. Mostly computers are easily accessed by the department of language and art, for there’re plenty software to utilize. Moreover, instructors can request their students to read some net materials if they have no idea about their paper; go the step further, to show how others presents the same notions. What’s more important part is that since the writing has been potential career in 21st era (for filming, TV, and Internet), the school teachers may want their pupils involved the profitable jobs if they’re trained into professional level.
In my viewpoint, it’s obviously that writing has altered into other form because the computer development and brand new lifestyle due to Internet. However, because the tremendous needs of markets and the profits, such kind of writing shows and is able to solve and improve our short time in composition.
In contract to the article, I think the original concept of composition somewhat is correct. If we ignore the essence of writing, then let alone to get others to understand or support our thoughts. To say more, I think writing still needs to carry the processing to build the full contention. Planning, composing, revising, and publishing still are weighty for they are the basic unit of composition structure. When beginning a paper, we might brainstorm into actual words. The main issue we want to argue for, what genres of writing we choose to convince the readers easily.If it’s necessary, we can adapt the original one into the special group favor. For example, the classical masterpieces are often rewritten in diverse form. Such Red Dream Chamber is rewritten to adept children. Shakespeare’s playwrights often are redirect into movies forms. I think, an excellent works aren’t written in very narrow area. If the main structure can support the rhetoric, the basic type of writing, then any form of writing can be produced. I think, the forms of writing are categorized after they appear, so it’s human to decide the writing not form do decision of us. A good writer should not always cater to the audience; he/she sometimes should put some ideas to inspire the audience- like Shakespeare. If writing don’t surge any other notion except entertainment, sometimes it’s much more like cliché and soap opera rather than good writing.
However, the students still not get involved into other’s literature masterpiece in the history, so they need the teachers accompanied to lead them approach like novels, plays, poems, etc. What’s more, the purpose reading those implies to those essential tips (relates to mode, aim, audience, and media)
With the advanced technology and universal use of computers, the writing is surely impacted. Schools begin to set up computer classrooms which pupils can write, edit, and publish their ideas in nonprint media. Mostly computers are easily accessed by the department of language and art, for there’re plenty software to utilize. Moreover, instructors can request their students to read some net materials if they have no idea about their paper; go the step further, to show how others presents the same notions. What’s more important part is that since the writing has been potential career in 21st era (for filming, TV, and Internet), the school teachers may want their pupils involved the profitable jobs if they’re trained into professional level.
In my viewpoint, it’s obviously that writing has altered into other form because the computer development and brand new lifestyle due to Internet. However, because the tremendous needs of markets and the profits, such kind of writing shows and is able to solve and improve our short time in composition.
In contract to the article, I think the original concept of composition somewhat is correct. If we ignore the essence of writing, then let alone to get others to understand or support our thoughts. To say more, I think writing still needs to carry the processing to build the full contention. Planning, composing, revising, and publishing still are weighty for they are the basic unit of composition structure. When beginning a paper, we might brainstorm into actual words. The main issue we want to argue for, what genres of writing we choose to convince the readers easily.If it’s necessary, we can adapt the original one into the special group favor. For example, the classical masterpieces are often rewritten in diverse form. Such Red Dream Chamber is rewritten to adept children. Shakespeare’s playwrights often are redirect into movies forms. I think, an excellent works aren’t written in very narrow area. If the main structure can support the rhetoric, the basic type of writing, then any form of writing can be produced. I think, the forms of writing are categorized after they appear, so it’s human to decide the writing not form do decision of us. A good writer should not always cater to the audience; he/she sometimes should put some ideas to inspire the audience- like Shakespeare. If writing don’t surge any other notion except entertainment, sometimes it’s much more like cliché and soap opera rather than good writing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)